Skip to main content
Back to Research Library
B
Good Confidence
Review Article2010

Cohen 2010: Limitations of Estimated Average Glucose

Cohen et al.Diabetes Care

Key Finding

Individual glycation variation can cause eAG to over- or underestimate true average glucose

Original title: Limitations in the use of estimated average glucose

Plain English Summary

Important paper highlighting individual variation in the A1C-glucose relationship due to differences in red blood cell lifespan and hemoglobin glycation rates.

In-Depth Analysis

Background

This review published in Diabetes Care (PMID: 20519377) addresses critical limitations of the estimated average glucose (eAG) concept following the 2008 ADAG study that established the A1C-to-glucose conversion formula.

Study Design

Critical review of the ADAG study methodology and subsequent clinical implementation, examining sources of individual variation in the A1C-glucose relationship.

Key Findings

Sources of individual variation:

FactorImpact on eAG
Red blood cell lifespan±15 days normal variation affects A1C
Hemoglobin glycation rateGenetic polymorphisms alter glycation
Anemia/hemoglobinopathiesCan falsely lower or raise A1C
PregnancyAltered RBC turnover
Kidney/liver diseaseAffects RBC survival

Key insight: The population-level equation (eAG = 28.7 × A1C − 46.7) has significant individual variation. Two people with identical A1C may have meaningfully different true average glucose levels.

Mechanistic Insights

A1C reflects average glycemia weighted toward recent weeks (due to RBC age distribution). Individuals with shorter RBC lifespan have lower A1C for a given glucose level. Glycation rate polymorphisms further modify the relationship.

Clinical Implications

eAG should not replace direct glucose monitoring. Discordance between A1C-derived eAG and measured glucose average should prompt investigation of interfering factors, not dismissal of patient-reported values.

Metabolic Health Perspective

For metabolic optimization, direct glucose measurement (CGM) provides superior insight into glycemic patterns, variability, and postprandial responses that A1C and eAG cannot capture.

Paradigm Relevance

How this study applies to different clinical perspectives:

Standard Medical

Conventional clinical guidelines used by most doctors

Not directly relevant to this paradigm

Research Consensus

Relevant

Current scientific understanding, often ahead of guidelines

Metabolic Optimization

Relevant

Proactive targets for optimal health, not just disease absence

Study Details

Type
Review Article

Topic

Related Biomarkers

HBA1CGLUCOSE

Calculate & Evaluate on Metabolicum

Original Source

View on PubMedView DOIFull Text Not Available

DOI (Digital Object Identifier) is a permanent link to this publication. Unlike website URLs that can change, a DOI always resolves to the correct source.

Related Studies