Cohen 2010: Limitations of Estimated Average Glucose
Cohen et al. • Diabetes Care
Key Finding
Individual glycation variation can cause eAG to over- or underestimate true average glucose
Original title: “Limitations in the use of estimated average glucose”
Plain English Summary
Important paper highlighting individual variation in the A1C-glucose relationship due to differences in red blood cell lifespan and hemoglobin glycation rates.
In-Depth Analysis
Background
This review published in Diabetes Care (PMID: 20519377) addresses critical limitations of the estimated average glucose (eAG) concept following the 2008 ADAG study that established the A1C-to-glucose conversion formula.
Study Design
Critical review of the ADAG study methodology and subsequent clinical implementation, examining sources of individual variation in the A1C-glucose relationship.
Key Findings
Sources of individual variation:
| Factor | Impact on eAG |
|---|---|
| Red blood cell lifespan | ±15 days normal variation affects A1C |
| Hemoglobin glycation rate | Genetic polymorphisms alter glycation |
| Anemia/hemoglobinopathies | Can falsely lower or raise A1C |
| Pregnancy | Altered RBC turnover |
| Kidney/liver disease | Affects RBC survival |
Key insight: The population-level equation (eAG = 28.7 × A1C − 46.7) has significant individual variation. Two people with identical A1C may have meaningfully different true average glucose levels.
Mechanistic Insights
A1C reflects average glycemia weighted toward recent weeks (due to RBC age distribution). Individuals with shorter RBC lifespan have lower A1C for a given glucose level. Glycation rate polymorphisms further modify the relationship.
Clinical Implications
eAG should not replace direct glucose monitoring. Discordance between A1C-derived eAG and measured glucose average should prompt investigation of interfering factors, not dismissal of patient-reported values.
Metabolic Health Perspective
For metabolic optimization, direct glucose measurement (CGM) provides superior insight into glycemic patterns, variability, and postprandial responses that A1C and eAG cannot capture.
Paradigm Relevance
How this study applies to different clinical perspectives:
Standard Medical
Conventional clinical guidelines used by most doctors
Not directly relevant to this paradigm
Research Consensus
RelevantCurrent scientific understanding, often ahead of guidelines
Metabolic Optimization
RelevantProactive targets for optimal health, not just disease absence
Study Details
- Type
- Review Article
Related Biomarkers
Calculate & Evaluate on Metabolicum
Original Source
DOI (Digital Object Identifier) is a permanent link to this publication. Unlike website URLs that can change, a DOI always resolves to the correct source.
Related Studies
Unwin 2020: Low Carb Diet in Type 2 Diabetes - General Practice Evidence
Unwin D et al. • BMJ Nutrition Prevention & Health • 2020
Lower carbohydrate dietary advice in primary care led to significant improvements in HbA1c, weight, and medication reduction
Insights from a general practice service evaluation supporting a lower carbohydrate diet in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and prediabetes: a secondary analysis of routine clinic data including HbA1c, weight and prescribing over 6 years
Unwin et al. • BMJ Nutrition, Prevention & Health • 2020
T2D drug-free remission: 46% (59/128); HbA1c 65.5→48 mmol/mol (P<0.001); weight 99.7→91.4 kg; prediabetes: 93% normalized HbA1c; £50,885/year prescription savings
Proton Pump Inhibitors, H2-Receptor Antagonists, Metformin, and Vitamin B-12 Deficiency: Clinical Implications
Miller JW • Advances in Nutrition • 2018
PPIs/H2RAs: HR 1.83 (95% CI 1.36-2.46) for B12 deficiency with ≥10 months use; Metformin: mean B12 reduction of -54 pmol/L (95% CI -81 to -26)