Skip to main content
Back to Research Library
A
High Confidence
Clinical Guideline2011

Sacks 2011: Laboratory Guidelines for Diabetes

Sacks et al.Diabetes Care

Key Finding

Standardized guidelines for HbA1c testing in diabetes management

Original title: Guidelines and recommendations for laboratory analysis in the diagnosis and management of diabetes mellitus

Plain English Summary

ADA/NACB guidelines for laboratory analysis in diabetes diagnosis and management, establishing standards for HbA1c testing and interpretation.

In-Depth Analysis

Background

Dr. David B. Sacks and the ADA/NACB Laboratory Medicine Practice Guidelines Expert Panel published these comprehensive guidelines in Diabetes Care (PMID: 21617108), standardizing laboratory testing for diabetes diagnosis and management.

Study Design

Expert consensus guidelines based on systematic evidence review for laboratory practices in diabetes care.

Key Findings

HbA1c for diagnosis:

HbA1c LevelInterpretation
<5.7%Normal
5.7-6.4%High risk (prediabetes)
≥6.5%Diabetes (requires confirmation)

Standardization requirements:

  • NGSP-certified methods only
  • CV <3% for precision
  • Annual proficiency testing

Conditions affecting HbA1c:

ConditionEffect on A1C
HemoglobinopathiesVariable (may interfere)
Anemia/hemolysisFalsely low
Iron deficiencyFalsely high
Chronic kidney diseaseVariable
Recent transfusionInaccurate

Treatment targets:

  • General: <7% (individualized)
  • Low hypoglycemia risk: <6.5%
  • Limited life expectancy: <8%

Mechanistic Insights

HbA1c standardization was critical because:

  • Different methods gave different results
  • NGSP calibration ensures comparability
  • Allows diagnosis and monitoring with single test

Clinical Implications

Laboratories must use NGSP-certified methods. Clinicians should recognize conditions affecting HbA1c accuracy. Alternative markers (fructosamine, glycated albumin) available when HbA1c unreliable.

Metabolic Health Perspective

For metabolic optimization, HbA1c <5.7% is the goal. However, some metabolically healthy low-carb individuals may have slightly higher fasting glucose with low HbA1c—context matters. CGM provides complementary information about glucose variability.

Paradigm Relevance

How this study applies to different clinical perspectives:

Standard Medical

Relevant

Conventional clinical guidelines used by most doctors

Research Consensus

Relevant

Current scientific understanding, often ahead of guidelines

Metabolic Optimization

Proactive targets for optimal health, not just disease absence

Not directly relevant to this paradigm

Study Details

Type
Clinical Guideline

Topic

Related Biomarkers

HBA1CGLUCOSE

Calculate & Evaluate on Metabolicum

Original Source

View on PubMedView DOIFull Text Not Available

DOI (Digital Object Identifier) is a permanent link to this publication. Unlike website URLs that can change, a DOI always resolves to the correct source.

Related Studies