Skip to main content
Back to Research Library
A
High Confidence
Review ArticleSource2016

Global Epidemiology of NAFLD

Younossi et al.Hepatology

Key Finding

NAFLD affects approximately 25% of adults globally with highest rates in Middle East and South America.

Original title: Global epidemiology of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease

Plain English Summary

Meta-analysis of NAFLD prevalence worldwide showing it affects ~25% of global population. Highlights metabolic syndrome as primary driver.

In-Depth Analysis

Background

Younossi ZM, Koenig AB, Abdelatif D, et al. Hepatology. 2016;64(1):73-84. PMID: 26707365

This systematic review and meta-analysis from Inova Fairfax Hospital established the global burden of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), documenting its emergence as the most common chronic liver disease worldwide.

Study Design

ParameterDetails
TypeSystematic review and meta-analysis
Data SourcesStudies from 1989-2015 across 22 countries
Total Subjects>8 million individuals
Primary OutcomeGlobal and regional NAFLD prevalence
Secondary OutcomesNASH prevalence, fibrosis rates, mortality

Key Findings

RegionNAFLD Prevalence
Global25.2%
Middle East31.8%
South America30.5%
Asia27.4%
North America24.1%
Europe23.7%
Africa13.5%

Among NAFLD patients: NASH prevalence 59.1%, significant fibrosis 20.3%.

Mechanistic Insights

The global rise parallels obesity and type 2 diabetes epidemics. The study documents NAFLD as the hepatic manifestation of metabolic syndrome, sharing common pathophysiology of insulin resistance and lipotoxicity.

Clinical Implications

NAFLD affects 1 in 4 adults globally and is now the leading cause of chronic liver disease. Most patients remain undiagnosed. Screening strategies using non-invasive methods (FLI, FIB-4) are increasingly important.

Metabolic Health Perspective

This landmark meta-analysis establishes NAFLD screening relevance. The Fatty Liver Index (FLI) calculator helps identify individuals who may benefit from further hepatic evaluation and metabolic intervention.

Paradigm Relevance

How this study applies to different clinical perspectives:

Standard Medical

Relevant

Conventional clinical guidelines used by most doctors

Research Consensus

Relevant

Current scientific understanding, often ahead of guidelines

Metabolic Optimization

Relevant

Proactive targets for optimal health, not just disease absence

Study Details

Type
Review Article

Calculate & Evaluate on Metabolicum

Original Source

Related Studies