Skip to main content
Back to Research Library
B
Good Confidence
Cohort StudyPMC Full Text2013

Hayashi 2013: Insulin Patterns During OGTT Predict Diabetes Risk

Hayashi et al.Diabetes Care

Key Finding

Pattern 4 (120-min peak, lower at 30 min): 47.8% diabetes incidence, OR 12.55 (95% CI 4.79-32.89) vs early peak patterns; Pattern 5: 37.5% incidence, OR 8.34

Key Findings

  • 1Five distinct insulin patterns during OGTT predict 10-year diabetes risk with dramatically different outcomes
  • 2Delayed insulin peak at 120 minutes (Pattern 4) showed 47.8% diabetes incidence vs only 3.2% for early peakers
  • 3Adjusted odds ratios for diabetes: 12.55 for Pattern 4 and 8.34 for Pattern 5 compared to Pattern 1
  • 4Delayed patterns correlate with reduced insulin sensitivity AND diminished early insulin secretion—dual dysfunction
  • 5OGTT insulin patterns can identify high-risk individuals years before fasting glucose becomes abnormal

Original title: Patterns of insulin concentration during the OGTT predict the risk of type 2 diabetes in Japanese Americans

Plain English Summary

10-11 year follow-up of 400 nondiabetic Japanese Americans examining insulin patterns during OGTT (peak timing at 30, 60, or 120 min) as diabetes predictors.

In-Depth Analysis

In 2013, Dr. Tomoshige Hayashi and colleagues published a groundbreaking 10-year study following Japanese Americans, revealing that the pattern of insulin response during an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) predicts diabetes risk far better than any single measurement.

The Kraft Legacy Extended

This study builds on Dr. Joseph Kraft's pioneering work identifying insulin response patterns. Hayashi's team applied rigorous statistical analysis to quantify what Kraft observed clinically: delayed insulin peaks signal metabolic dysfunction years before glucose becomes abnormal.

Study Design

The researchers followed 400 non-diabetic Japanese Americans for 10-11 years, performing detailed OGTT measurements at baseline. They identified five distinct insulin response patterns based on when insulin peaked (30, 60, or 120 minutes) and how levels changed across timepoints.

The Five Patterns

  • Pattern 1: Early peak at 30 min, rapid decline → Lowest risk (3.2% developed diabetes)
  • Patterns 2-3: Intermediate peaks → Moderate risk
  • Pattern 4: Delayed peak at 120 min, rising throughout → Highest risk (47.8% developed diabetes)
  • Pattern 5: Delayed peak with partial compensation → High risk (37.5% developed diabetes)

Clinical Implications

Individuals with delayed insulin peaks (patterns 4 and 5) had dramatically elevated diabetes risk—odds ratios of 12.55 and 8.34 respectively compared to early responders. These patterns identify beta cell dysfunction and insulin resistance years before fasting glucose or HbA1c become diagnostic.

Why This Matters

A standard 2-hour OGTT with insulin measurements at multiple timepoints can reveal metabolic trajectory that single fasting measurements miss entirely. Early intervention becomes possible when dysfunction is still reversible.

Paradigm Relevance

How this study applies to different clinical perspectives:

Standard Medical

Conventional clinical guidelines used by most doctors

Not directly relevant to this paradigm

Research Consensus

Relevant

Current scientific understanding, often ahead of guidelines

Why it matters:

Validates Kraft-type patterns as independent diabetes predictors beyond static measures.

Metabolic Optimization

Relevant

Proactive targets for optimal health, not just disease absence

Why it matters:

Supports comprehensive insulin dynamics assessment for early metabolic dysfunction detection.

Study Details

Type
Cohort Study
Methodology
N = 400 nondiabetic Japanese Americans. 10-11 year follow-up. Insulin patterns classified by peak timing (30, 60, or 120 min). 86 incident diabetes cases.

Evidence Quality

Grade B - Prospective cohort. PMC3631850. Supports Kraft insulin pattern concept.

Topic

Related Biomarkers

INSULINGLUCOSE

Calculate & Evaluate on Metabolicum

Original Source

DOI (Digital Object Identifier) is a permanent link to this publication. Unlike website URLs that can change, a DOI always resolves to the correct source.

Related Studies