Hayashi 2013: Insulin Patterns During OGTT Predict Diabetes Risk
Hayashi et al. • Diabetes Care
Key Finding
Pattern 4 (120-min peak, lower at 30 min): 47.8% diabetes incidence, OR 12.55 (95% CI 4.79-32.89) vs early peak patterns; Pattern 5: 37.5% incidence, OR 8.34
Key Findings
- 1Five distinct insulin patterns during OGTT predict 10-year diabetes risk with dramatically different outcomes
- 2Delayed insulin peak at 120 minutes (Pattern 4) showed 47.8% diabetes incidence vs only 3.2% for early peakers
- 3Adjusted odds ratios for diabetes: 12.55 for Pattern 4 and 8.34 for Pattern 5 compared to Pattern 1
- 4Delayed patterns correlate with reduced insulin sensitivity AND diminished early insulin secretion—dual dysfunction
- 5OGTT insulin patterns can identify high-risk individuals years before fasting glucose becomes abnormal
Original title: “Patterns of insulin concentration during the OGTT predict the risk of type 2 diabetes in Japanese Americans”
Plain English Summary
10-11 year follow-up of 400 nondiabetic Japanese Americans examining insulin patterns during OGTT (peak timing at 30, 60, or 120 min) as diabetes predictors.
In-Depth Analysis
In 2013, Dr. Tomoshige Hayashi and colleagues published a groundbreaking 10-year study following Japanese Americans, revealing that the pattern of insulin response during an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) predicts diabetes risk far better than any single measurement.
The Kraft Legacy Extended
This study builds on Dr. Joseph Kraft's pioneering work identifying insulin response patterns. Hayashi's team applied rigorous statistical analysis to quantify what Kraft observed clinically: delayed insulin peaks signal metabolic dysfunction years before glucose becomes abnormal.
Study Design
The researchers followed 400 non-diabetic Japanese Americans for 10-11 years, performing detailed OGTT measurements at baseline. They identified five distinct insulin response patterns based on when insulin peaked (30, 60, or 120 minutes) and how levels changed across timepoints.
The Five Patterns
- •Pattern 1: Early peak at 30 min, rapid decline → Lowest risk (3.2% developed diabetes)
- •Patterns 2-3: Intermediate peaks → Moderate risk
- •Pattern 4: Delayed peak at 120 min, rising throughout → Highest risk (47.8% developed diabetes)
- •Pattern 5: Delayed peak with partial compensation → High risk (37.5% developed diabetes)
Clinical Implications
Individuals with delayed insulin peaks (patterns 4 and 5) had dramatically elevated diabetes risk—odds ratios of 12.55 and 8.34 respectively compared to early responders. These patterns identify beta cell dysfunction and insulin resistance years before fasting glucose or HbA1c become diagnostic.
Why This Matters
A standard 2-hour OGTT with insulin measurements at multiple timepoints can reveal metabolic trajectory that single fasting measurements miss entirely. Early intervention becomes possible when dysfunction is still reversible.
Paradigm Relevance
How this study applies to different clinical perspectives:
Standard Medical
Conventional clinical guidelines used by most doctors
Not directly relevant to this paradigm
Research Consensus
RelevantCurrent scientific understanding, often ahead of guidelines
Why it matters:
Validates Kraft-type patterns as independent diabetes predictors beyond static measures.
Metabolic Optimization
RelevantProactive targets for optimal health, not just disease absence
Why it matters:
Supports comprehensive insulin dynamics assessment for early metabolic dysfunction detection.
Study Details
- Type
- Cohort Study
- Methodology
- N = 400 nondiabetic Japanese Americans. 10-11 year follow-up. Insulin patterns classified by peak timing (30, 60, or 120 min). 86 incident diabetes cases.
Evidence Quality
Grade B - Prospective cohort. PMC3631850. Supports Kraft insulin pattern concept.
Related Biomarkers
Calculate & Evaluate on Metabolicum
Original Source
DOI (Digital Object Identifier) is a permanent link to this publication. Unlike website URLs that can change, a DOI always resolves to the correct source.
Related Studies
Freeman 2023: Insulin Resistance - Clinical Overview
Freeman et al. • StatPearls Publishing • 2023
HOMA-IR is the most practical clinical tool for assessing insulin resistance
Insights from a general practice service evaluation supporting a lower carbohydrate diet in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and prediabetes: a secondary analysis of routine clinic data including HbA1c, weight and prescribing over 6 years
Unwin et al. • BMJ Nutrition, Prevention & Health • 2020
T2D drug-free remission: 46% (59/128); HbA1c 65.5→48 mmol/mol (P<0.001); weight 99.7→91.4 kg; prediabetes: 93% normalized HbA1c; £50,885/year prescription savings
Sutton 2018: Time-Restricted Eating Improves Insulin Sensitivity
Sutton et al. • Cell Metabolism • 2018
Early 6-hour eating window improved insulin sensitivity by 36% without weight loss