Skip to main content
Back to Research Library
A
High Confidence
Landmark StudyPubMed Abstract1985

Homeostasis model assessment: insulin resistance and beta-cell function from fasting plasma glucose and insulin concentrations in man

Matthews DR, et al.Diabetologia

Key Finding

The estimate of insulin resistance obtained by homeostasis model assessment correlated with estimates obtained by the euglycaemic clamp (Rs = 0.88, P less than 0.0001)

Key Findings

  • 1Insulin resistance estimate correlates with euglycaemic clamp: Rs = 0.88 (P < 0.0001)
  • 2Beta-cell function estimate correlates with hyperglycaemic clamp: Rs = 0.61 (P < 0.01)
  • 3Model coefficient of variation similar to clamp methods: 31-32%

Original title: Homeostasis model assessment: insulin resistance and β-cell function from fasting plasma glucose and insulin concentrations in man

Plain English Summary

The steady-state basal plasma glucose and insulin concentrations are determined by their interaction in a feedback loop. A computer-solved model has been used to predict the homeostatic concentrations which arise from varying degrees beta-cell deficiency and insulin resistance. Comparison of a patient's fasting values with the model's predictions allows a quantitative assessment of the contributions of insulin resistance and deficient beta-cell function to the fasting hyperglycaemia.

In-Depth Analysis

Abstract (verbatim from original paper)

"The steady-state basal plasma glucose and insulin concentrations are determined by their interaction in a feedback loop. A computer-solved model has been used to predict the homeostatic concentrations which arise from varying degrees beta-cell deficiency and insulin resistance. Comparison of a patient's fasting values with the model's predictions allows a quantitative assessment of the contributions of insulin resistance and deficient beta-cell function to the fasting hyperglycaemia."

Key Statistics (from original paper)

  • Insulin resistance vs euglycaemic clamp: Rs = 0.88 (P < 0.0001)
  • Beta-cell function vs hyperglycaemic clamp: Rs = 0.61 (P < 0.01)
  • Coefficient of variation (IR estimate): 31%
  • Coefficient of variation (β-cell estimate): 32%

Authors' Conclusion

"The accuracy and precision of the estimate have been determined by comparison with independent measures of insulin resistance and beta-cell function using hyperglycaemic and euglycaemic clamps and an intravenous glucose tolerance test."

"The low variability of the estimates from the model (coefficient of variation: 31% and 32% respectively) is similar to that of the hyperglycaemic and euglycaemic clamp methods."


Note: This content is derived from the PubMed abstract (PMID 3899825). Full text is not freely available as this 1985 paper predates the PMC archive.

Paradigm Relevance

How this study applies to different clinical perspectives:

Standard Medical

Relevant

Conventional clinical guidelines used by most doctors

Research Consensus

Relevant

Current scientific understanding, often ahead of guidelines

Metabolic Optimization

Relevant

Proactive targets for optimal health, not just disease absence

Study Details

Type
Landmark Study
Methodology
Computer-solved model validated against hyperglycaemic and euglycaemic clamps and intravenous glucose tolerance test. Coefficients of variation: 31% (insulin resistance) and 32% (beta-cell function).

Evidence Quality

Foundational derivation study. Validated in subsequent research globally. Note: Full text not available in PMC (predates archive). Content sourced from PubMed abstract only.

Topic

Related Biomarkers

FASTING INSULINFASTING GLUCOSEHOMA IRHOMA B

Calculate & Evaluate on Metabolicum

Original Source

View on PubMedView DOIFull Text Not Available

DOI (Digital Object Identifier) is a permanent link to this publication. Unlike website URLs that can change, a DOI always resolves to the correct source.

Related Studies