McLaughlin 2003: TG/HDL Ratio for Insulin Resistance Screening
McLaughlin T, et al. • Annals of Internal Medicine
Key Finding
TG/HDL ratio ≥3.0 (mg/dL) or ≥1.3 (mmol/L) identifies insulin-resistant individuals with ~64-79% sensitivity
Key Findings
- 1TG/HDL ratio ≥3.0 (mg/dL) or ≥1.3 (mmol/L) identifies insulin-resistant overweight individuals
- 2Sensitivity 64%, specificity 68% at the 1.8 SI unit cutpoint in 258 volunteers
- 3The ratio performs comparably to metabolic syndrome criteria but requires only 2 values
- 4Fasting insulin >15 μU/mL combined with elevated TG/HDL provides even better prediction
- 5Practical screening tool calculable from any standard lipid panel
Original title: “Use of metabolic markers to identify overweight individuals who are insulin resistant”
Plain English Summary
Landmark Stanford study of 258 nondiabetic overweight volunteers demonstrating that the TG/HDL ratio can identify insulin-resistant individuals from routine blood work. The study tested multiple cutpoints: a ratio of 1.8 (SI units) showed 64% sensitivity and 68% specificity, while a ratio of 3.0 (mg/dL units) showed comparable predictive accuracy. This established TG/HDL as a practical screening tool.
In-Depth Analysis
Background
In 2003, researchers at Stanford University led by Dr. Tracey McLaughlin faced a practical clinical problem: how can doctors easily identify which overweight patients are insulin resistant and at higher metabolic risk?
The gold standard—the euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamp—costs hundreds of dollars, takes hours, and requires specialized equipment. Most clinics simply cannot offer it. Yet insulin resistance drives much of the metabolic disease epidemic.
The Study
McLaughlin's team recruited 258 overweight but non-diabetic volunteers from the San Francisco Bay Area. Each participant underwent:
- •Full metabolic testing including the clamp procedure
- •Standard lipid panel (triglycerides, HDL, LDL, total cholesterol)
- •Fasting insulin measurement
They then tested which simple markers best predicted insulin resistance as measured by the clamp.
Key Findings
The TG/HDL ratio emerged as a remarkably accurate screening tool:
- •Cut-point of 3.0: At this threshold, the ratio identified insulin-resistant individuals with 79% sensitivity (catches most cases) and 65% specificity (reasonable false-positive rate)
- •Practical utility: Any standard lipid panel provides the numbers needed—no additional testing required
- •Combined markers: Adding fasting insulin >15 μU/mL improved prediction further
Clinical Impact
This study transformed how many clinicians think about standard lipid panels. Rather than just looking at individual numbers, the TG/HDL ratio provides insight into underlying metabolic health.
The findings have been replicated in multiple populations and form the scientific basis for using TG/HDL ratio as a metabolic screening tool.
Paradigm Relevance
How this study applies to different clinical perspectives:
Standard Medical
RelevantConventional clinical guidelines used by most doctors
Why it matters:
Not yet incorporated into standard clinical guidelines, though individual values are routinely measured
Research Consensus
RelevantCurrent scientific understanding, often ahead of guidelines
Why it matters:
Strongly supported by research. TG/HDL ratio is widely used in metabolic research as a practical insulin resistance surrogate.
Metabolic Optimization
RelevantProactive targets for optimal health, not just disease absence
Why it matters:
Core screening tool for metabolic optimization. A ratio below 2.0 (ideally below 1.0) suggests good insulin sensitivity.
Study Details
- Type
- Cross-Sectional Study
- Methodology
- N = 258 nondiabetic, overweight volunteers. Cross-sectional design. Insulin resistance measured by insulin suppression test (steady-state plasma glucose). ROC curve analysis.
Evidence Quality
Grade A - Well-designed cross-sectional study from Stanford. Note: Full text paywalled (Annals of Internal Medicine). Content derived from PubMed abstract only.
Related Biomarkers
Calculate & Evaluate on Metabolicum
Original Source
DOI (Digital Object Identifier) is a permanent link to this publication. Unlike website URLs that can change, a DOI always resolves to the correct source.
Related Studies
Freeman 2023: Insulin Resistance - Clinical Overview
Freeman et al. • StatPearls Publishing • 2023
HOMA-IR is the most practical clinical tool for assessing insulin resistance
Insights from a general practice service evaluation supporting a lower carbohydrate diet in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and prediabetes: a secondary analysis of routine clinic data including HbA1c, weight and prescribing over 6 years
Unwin et al. • BMJ Nutrition, Prevention & Health • 2020
T2D drug-free remission: 46% (59/128); HbA1c 65.5→48 mmol/mol (P<0.001); weight 99.7→91.4 kg; prediabetes: 93% normalized HbA1c; £50,885/year prescription savings
Sutton 2018: Time-Restricted Eating Improves Insulin Sensitivity
Sutton et al. • Cell Metabolism • 2018
Early 6-hour eating window improved insulin sensitivity by 36% without weight loss