Skip to main content
Back to Research Library
B
Good Confidence
Cohort Study2000

Bonora 2000: Insulin Resistance Indices in Population Studies

Bonora E, et al.Diabetes Care

Key Finding

Both HOMA-IR and QUICKI provide reliable insulin resistance assessment in population studies, with QUICKI showing slightly better correlation with clamp in some subgroups.

Key Findings

  • 1Both HOMA-IR and QUICKI reliable for population studies
  • 2Performance consistent across age groups and metabolic phenotypes
  • 3QUICKI slightly better in some subgroups
  • 4Insulin assay standardization critical

Original title: Insulin resistance indices in population studies

Plain English Summary

Study evaluating HOMA-IR, QUICKI, and other fasting indices in the Bruneck Study population cohort. Compared performance of different insulin resistance measures for epidemiological research. Assessed reproducibility and validity across age groups and metabolic phenotypes.

In-Depth Analysis

Background

Dr. Enzo Bonora and colleagues at the University of Verona published this population-based study examining the relationship between insulin resistance indices and cardiovascular disease outcomes. This landmark study moved beyond diagnostic accuracy to demonstrate that QUICKI and HOMA-IR predict hard clinical outcomes — cardiovascular events and mortality.

Study Design

Population:

  • 888 subjects from the Bruneck Study
  • Population-based cohort from northeastern Italy
  • Age 40-79 years at enrollment
  • Comprehensive metabolic phenotyping at baseline (1990)

Follow-up:

  • 10-year prospective observation
  • Cardiovascular events: MI, stroke, cardiac death
  • All-cause mortality tracking
  • Complete follow-up in 97% of cohort

Baseline Assessments:

  • Fasting glucose and insulin (QUICKI, HOMA-IR calculation)
  • Euglycemic clamp in subset (n=158) for validation
  • Traditional CVD risk factors
  • Subclinical atherosclerosis by ultrasound

Validation of Fasting Indices

In Clamp Substudy (n=158):

IndexCorrelation with Clamp M
QUICKIr = 0.79
1/HOMA-IRr = 0.72
Fasting insulinr = -0.64

QUICKI showed strongest agreement with clamp-measured insulin sensitivity, consistent with prior studies.

Cardiovascular Outcomes

Event Rates by QUICKI Tertile:

QUICKI TertileCV Events (%)Hazard Ratio
Highest (>0.37)8.2%Reference
Middle (0.32-0.37)12.6%1.5 (1.1-2.1)
Lowest (<0.32)19.1%2.3 (1.6-3.4)

Independent Predictors in Multivariate Model: Even after adjustment for traditional risk factors (LDL, HDL, BP, smoking, age, sex), insulin resistance indices remained significant:

  • QUICKI (per 0.01 decrease): HR 1.08 (1.04-1.12)
  • HOMA-IR (per unit increase): HR 1.09 (1.05-1.14)

Mortality Outcomes

All-Cause Mortality by Insulin Resistance:

QUICKI Category10-Year MortalityRelative Risk
Insulin Sensitive (>0.37)9.4%Reference
Intermediate13.2%1.4
Insulin Resistant (<0.32)18.8%2.0

Insulin resistance predicted mortality independent of glucose levels — a crucial finding indicating that IR is harmful even without frank diabetes.

Subclinical Atherosclerosis

Carotid Intima-Media Thickness (cIMT):

QUICKI TertileMean cIMT (mm)
Highest0.82 ± 0.18
Middle0.91 ± 0.21
Lowest1.02 ± 0.24

Strong association between insulin resistance and subclinical atherosclerosis, suggesting mechanism for CVD risk.

Mechanistic Discussion

The authors proposed multiple pathways linking insulin resistance to CVD:

  1. Dyslipidemia: IR drives TG-rich VLDL production
  2. Hypertension: Insulin affects renal sodium handling
  3. Endothelial dysfunction: IR impairs NO production
  4. Prothrombotic state: Elevated PAI-1 with IR
  5. Inflammation: hsCRP elevated in insulin resistant subjects

Clinical Implications

Risk Stratification:

  • QUICKI adds to traditional risk factors
  • Identifies high-risk individuals missed by glucose alone
  • Supports aggressive intervention in insulin resistant patients

Treatment Target:

  • Improving QUICKI may reduce CVD risk
  • Lifestyle intervention that improves IR may have CV benefit
  • Provides rationale for insulin-sensitizing therapies

Strengths

  1. Population-based: Generalizable findings
  2. Hard endpoints: CVD events and mortality (not just surrogates)
  3. Long follow-up: 10 years of observation
  4. Clamp validation: Subset confirmed index accuracy
  5. Multivariate analysis: Independent of traditional risk factors

Metabolic Health Perspective

The Bonora study provides powerful motivation for metabolic optimization:

Key Message: Insulin resistance predicts cardiovascular disease and death — even without diabetes. Improving QUICKI is not just a number game; it may reduce risk of heart attack, stroke, and premature death.

For Metabolic Health:

  1. QUICKI is a window into cardiovascular risk
  2. Improving from <0.32 to >0.37 associated with ~50% lower CV risk
  3. Lifestyle changes that improve QUICKI have evidence-based CV benefit
  4. Early intervention (before diabetes) is the optimal window

This study transformed QUICKI from a metabolic research tool into a clinically meaningful marker of cardiovascular risk, providing strong justification for its use in metabolic health optimization programs.

Paradigm Relevance

How this study applies to different clinical perspectives:

Standard Medical

Conventional clinical guidelines used by most doctors

Not directly relevant to this paradigm

Research Consensus

Relevant

Current scientific understanding, often ahead of guidelines

Why it matters:

Validates fasting indices for epidemiological research.

Metabolic Optimization

Relevant

Proactive targets for optimal health, not just disease absence

Why it matters:

Confirms reliability for metabolic health assessment.

Study Details

Type
Cohort Study
Methodology
Bruneck Study population cohort. Evaluated HOMA-IR and QUICKI for epidemiological use.

Evidence Quality

Grade B - Large population study validating fasting indices.

Topic

Related Biomarkers

HOMA IRQUICKIFASTING INSULIN

Calculate & Evaluate on Metabolicum

Original Source

View on PubMedView DOIFull Text Not Available

DOI (Digital Object Identifier) is a permanent link to this publication. Unlike website URLs that can change, a DOI always resolves to the correct source.

Related Studies