Skip to main content
Back to Research Library
B
Good Confidence
Review ArticleSource2016

Global Survey of Omega-3 Fatty Acids in Healthy Adults

Stark et al.Prog Lipid Res

Key Finding

Most of the world has omega-3 levels below cardioprotective thresholds.

Original title: Global survey of the omega-3 fatty acids in the blood stream of healthy adults

Plain English Summary

Worldwide assessment of EPA+DHA blood levels showing most populations have low omega-3 status. Only a few regions (Japan, Scandinavia) achieve cardioprotective levels.

In-Depth Analysis

Background

Dr. Ken D. Stark and colleagues published this global survey in Progress in Lipid Research (PMID: 27216485), mapping omega-3 fatty acid status in healthy adults worldwide.

Study Design

Design: Systematic compilation of EPA+DHA blood level data Scope: Studies from multiple countries measuring RBC or plasma omega-3 levels Standardization: Adjusted for different measurement methods

Key Findings

Global Omega-3 Index distribution:

RegionOmega-3 IndexRisk Category
Japan9-11%Low risk
Korea8-10%Low risk
Scandinavia6-8%Intermediate
Mediterranean5-7%Intermediate
USA4-5%High risk
UK/Germany4-5%High risk
Middle East3-4%Very high risk

Key insight: Most of the world's population has omega-3 levels below the cardioprotective threshold of 8%.

Dietary correlates:

  • Fish consumption primary determinant
  • Supplementation effective but varies by product
  • Genetic variation affects conversion from ALA

Mechanistic Insights

Regional differences reflect:

  1. Traditional diet patterns (fish consumption)
  2. Food supply (aquaculture availability)
  3. Supplement use prevalence
  4. Genetic background (FADS variants)

Clinical Implications

Most populations would benefit from increased omega-3 intake. Testing provides individual assessment—diet history alone is insufficient due to absorption variability.

Metabolic Health Perspective

This survey reveals a global omega-3 deficiency affecting cardiovascular and metabolic health. Achieving an Omega-3 Index ≥8% is a reasonable target for metabolic optimization.

Paradigm Relevance

How this study applies to different clinical perspectives:

Standard Medical

Conventional clinical guidelines used by most doctors

Not directly relevant to this paradigm

Research Consensus

Relevant

Current scientific understanding, often ahead of guidelines

Metabolic Optimization

Relevant

Proactive targets for optimal health, not just disease absence

Study Details

Type
Review Article

Calculate & Evaluate on Metabolicum

Original Source

Related Studies