Skip to main content
Back to Research Library
B
Good Confidence
Cohort StudyPMC Full Text2024

Budoff 2024: The KETO Trial Shows No Excess Plaque in High-LDL Dieters

Budoff et al.JACC: Advances

Key Finding

KETO vs control: CAC median 0 vs 1 (P=0.520); total plaque score 0 vs 1 (P=0.357); 55% vs 48% zero CAC; no correlation between LDL and plaque (r=0.12, P=0.29)

Key Findings

  • 1No significant difference in coronary plaque between ketogenic dieters (mean LDL 272 mg/dL) and controls (mean LDL 123 mg/dL)
  • 2Median coronary artery calcium scores: 0 in keto group vs 1 in controls (p=0.520)—essentially equivalent
  • 3No correlation found between LDL level and plaque burden within the ketogenic group—LDL 300 vs 500 made no difference
  • 4Study included 160 subjects with CT angiography (gold standard) over mean 4.7 years of sustained ketogenic eating
  • 5Results suggest metabolic context matters: LDL elevation with low TG and high HDL may not carry standard atherosclerotic risk

Original title: Carbohydrate Restriction-Induced Elevations in LDL-Cholesterol and Atherosclerosis: The KETO Trial

Plain English Summary

Compared coronary plaque in 80 LMHR phenotype individuals on keto (mean 4.7 years, LDL 272 mg/dL) vs 80 matched controls (LDL 123 mg/dL). No significant difference in CAC or plaque scores.

In-Depth Analysis

In 2024, Dr. Matthew Budoff and colleagues published the highly anticipated KETO Trial—the first study to directly examine whether the dramatically elevated LDL cholesterol seen in ketogenic dieters translates to increased coronary atherosclerosis.

The Critical Question

The LMHR phenotype presented a clinical dilemma: these individuals had LDL levels sometimes exceeding 500 mg/dL—numbers that in other contexts would trigger immediate aggressive treatment. But their metabolic profiles were otherwise excellent. Do the standard cardiovascular risk rules apply?

Study Design

The researchers recruited 80 adults on sustained ketogenic diets (mean 4.7 years) with elevated LDL cholesterol (mean 272 mg/dL, range up to 591 mg/dL) and compared them to 80 matched controls with normal LDL (mean 123 mg/dL). Both groups underwent coronary CT angiography (CCTA), the gold standard for detecting coronary plaque.

Key Results

No significant difference in coronary plaque burden was found. Median coronary artery calcium (CAC) scores were 0 vs 1 (p=0.520). Total, calcified, and non-calcified plaque volumes were similar between groups.

Perhaps most striking: there was no correlation between LDL-C level and coronary plaque among the ketogenic dieters. Individuals with LDL of 300 did not have more plaque than those with LDL of 500.

Implications

These findings suggest that LDL cholesterol elevation in the context of carbohydrate restriction and metabolic health may not carry the same atherosclerotic risk as LDL elevation in the context of metabolic dysfunction. The lipid particle composition and function may differ fundamentally.

Limitations and Caveats

This was an observational study with 4.7 years mean exposure. Longer-term outcomes and randomized data are still needed. However, these results provide meaningful reassurance that aggressive LDL lowering may not be mandatory in metabolically healthy ketogenic dieters.

Paradigm Relevance

How this study applies to different clinical perspectives:

Standard Medical

Relevant

Conventional clinical guidelines used by most doctors

Why it matters:

Very high LDL-C levels (>270 mg/dL) maintained for years did not result in increased CAC or plaque burden compared to matched controls, challenging conventional LDL-centric risk models in metabolically healthy populations.

Research Consensus

Relevant

Current scientific understanding, often ahead of guidelines

Why it matters:

Provides first long-term outcome data for the LMHR phenotype. Demonstrates that LDL concentration alone may not predict atherosclerosis when metabolic context (high HDL, low TG, lean BMI) is favorable.

Metabolic Optimization

Relevant

Proactive targets for optimal health, not just disease absence

Why it matters:

For confirmed LMHR individuals (LDL >200 with HDL >80, TG <70, lean BMI), consider CAC scoring rather than treating based on LDL alone. This study suggests favorable metabolic context may modify LDL-associated risk.

Study Details

Type
Cohort Study
Methodology
Cross-sectional comparison. N = 80 LMHR phenotype vs N = 80 matched controls. CCTA imaging. Mean 4.7±2.8 years on diet.

Evidence Quality

Grade B - Observational comparison. PMC11450898. First imaging study of LMHR phenotype.

Topic

Related Biomarkers

LDLHDLTRIGLYCERIDES

Calculate & Evaluate on Metabolicum

Original Source

DOI (Digital Object Identifier) is a permanent link to this publication. Unlike website URLs that can change, a DOI always resolves to the correct source.

Related Studies