The Lipid Energy Model: Reimagining Lipoprotein Function in the Context of Carbohydrate-Restricted Diets
Norwitz et al. • Metabolites
Key Finding
LEM proposes carbohydrate restriction in lean individuals increases hepatic VLDL secretion with enhanced lipoprotein lipase turnover, generating elevated LDL without FH genetic markers
Key Findings
- 1LMHR: LDL ~320 mg/dL, HDL ~99 mg/dL, TG ~47 mg/dL post-CRD
- 2LEM: increased VLDL secretion + enhanced LPL turnover in lean individuals
- 3Pattern lacks familial hypercholesterolemia genetic markers
- 4Proposes adaptive energy trafficking rather than pathological hyperlipidemia
Original title: “The Lipid Energy Model: Reimagining Lipoprotein Function in the Context of Carbohydrate-Restricted Diets”
Plain English Summary
Proposes Lipid Energy Model to explain LMHR phenotype: lean individuals on CRD show elevated LDL-C (~320 mg/dL), high HDL-C (~99 mg/dL), low TG (~47 mg/dL) - inverse of typical pattern.
In-Depth Analysis
Study Details
Authors: Nicholas G Norwitz, Adrian Soto-Mota, Bob Kaplan, David S Ludwig, Matthew Budoff, Anatol Kontush, David Feldman
Institutions: Harvard Medical School, Lundquist Institute at UCLA, INSERM/Sorbonne
Journal: Metabolites, 2022 May; 12(5):460
PMCID: PMC9147253
Key Points (from original paper)
LMHR Phenotype Values
- •Pre-diet LDL-C: ~145-148 mg/dL
- •Post-diet LDL-C: ~320 mg/dL (some exceed 500 mg/dL)
- •Post-diet HDL-C: ~99 mg/dL
- •Post-diet triglycerides: ~47 mg/dL
The Lipid Energy Model (LEM)
Core Mechanism: Carbohydrate restriction in lean individuals leads to:
- •Increased hepatic VLDL secretion
- •Enhanced lipoprotein lipase-mediated turnover
- •Resulting lipid triad (high LDL, high HDL, low TG)
Key Distinction:
- •Pattern occurs without genetic familial hypercholesterolemia markers
- •Inverse of typical atherogenic dyslipidemia
Clinical Implications
Model proposes this represents adaptive energy trafficking in lean, carbohydrate-restricted individuals rather than pathological hyperlipidemia.
Source: PMC full text (PMC9147253)
Paradigm Relevance
How this study applies to different clinical perspectives:
Standard Medical
Conventional clinical guidelines used by most doctors
Not directly relevant to this paradigm
Research Consensus
RelevantCurrent scientific understanding, often ahead of guidelines
Why it matters:
Proposes that elevated LDL in metabolically healthy, lean low-carb dieters may represent normal energy trafficking rather than pathology. Identifies inverse BMI-LDL relationship unique to carbohydrate restriction.
Metabolic Optimization
RelevantProactive targets for optimal health, not just disease absence
Why it matters:
The LMHR phenotype (LDL >200, HDL >80, TG <70 mg/dL) may indicate efficient fat-as-fuel metabolism. Consider this context when interpreting elevated LDL in lean, metabolically healthy low-carb individuals.
Study Details
- Type
- Review Article
- Methodology
- Theoretical model paper proposing mechanism for LMHR phenotype based on metabolic observations.
Evidence Quality
Hypothesis/model paper from PMC9147253. Multi-institutional author team including Harvard, UCLA.
Related Biomarkers
Calculate & Evaluate on Metabolicum
Original Source
DOI (Digital Object Identifier) is a permanent link to this publication. Unlike website URLs that can change, a DOI always resolves to the correct source.
Related Studies
Budoff 2024: The KETO Trial Shows No Excess Plaque in High-LDL Dieters
Budoff et al. • JACC: Advances • 2024
KETO vs control: CAC median 0 vs 1 (P=0.520); total plaque score 0 vs 1 (P=0.357); 55% vs 48% zero CAC; no correlation between LDL and plaque (r=0.12, P=0.29)
Norwitz 2021: Evidence for the Lean Mass Hyper-Responder Phenotype
Norwitz et al. • Current Developments in Nutrition • 2022
LMHR criteria (18% of sample): LDL ≥200, HDL ≥80, TG ≤70 mg/dL; LMHR BMI 22.0 vs 24.6 non-LMHR (P=1.2×10⁻¹⁰); median LDL increase 146 vs 61 mg/dL
Vega 2014: TG/HDL Predicts Both Heart Disease Death and Diabetes
Vega GL, et al. • Journal of Investigative Medicine • 2014
TG/HDL ratio ≥3.5 predicted cardiovascular mortality and doubled diabetes incidence in large prospective cohort