McLaughlin 2005: TG/HDL Works Regardless of Body Weight
McLaughlin T, et al. • American Journal of Cardiology
Key Finding
TG/HDL ratio ≥3.5 identifies insulin-resistant, dyslipidemic individuals with sensitivity and specificity comparable to metabolic syndrome criteria
Key Findings
- 1TG/HDL ratio identified insulin resistance regardless of body weight
- 2Metabolic dysfunction can occur at any body size—not just in overweight individuals
- 3The ratio works as a universal screening tool across the entire weight spectrum
- 4Normal-weight individuals with elevated TG/HDL may have hidden metabolic dysfunction
- 5This finding is critical for identifying the MUNW (metabolically unhealthy normal weight) phenotype
Original title: “Is there a simple way to identify insulin-resistant individuals at increased risk of cardiovascular disease?”
Plain English Summary
Study evaluating whether routine lipoprotein measurements can identify insulin-resistant patients at elevated cardiovascular risk. Analyzed 449 patients for insulin resistance using the insulin suppression test and 1,135 patients for LDL particle analysis via gradient gel electrophoresis. The TG/HDL ratio proved to be the best predictor of both insulin resistance and LDL particle diameter.
In-Depth Analysis
Background
Following their landmark 2003 study, the Stanford team led by Dr. McLaughlin asked an important follow-up question: does the TG/HDL ratio work only in overweight people, or is it a universal marker of insulin resistance?
This matters because metabolic dysfunction can occur at any body size. The "metabolically unhealthy normal weight" (MUNW) phenotype describes people with normal BMI who nevertheless have insulin resistance and elevated cardiovascular risk.
The Study
The researchers evaluated 449 healthy participants using the insulin suppression test (gold-standard for measuring insulin resistance) and analyzed LDL particle characteristics in 1,135 patients via gradient gel electrophoresis.
Key Findings
The results confirmed that TG/HDL ratio is a powerful metabolic marker:
- •Best predictor: The TG/HDL ratio was the single best predictor of both insulin resistance AND LDL particle diameter
- •Cutpoint of 3.5: A ratio ≥3.5 (mg/dL units) identified insulin-resistant patients with sensitivity and specificity comparable to full metabolic syndrome criteria
- •Small dense LDL: The ratio showed even greater sensitivity/specificity for detecting atherogenic small, dense LDL particles
Clinical Impact
This study has important implications for clinical practice:
- •Simple screening tool: TG/HDL ratio from any standard lipid panel can identify metabolic dysfunction
- •Beyond MetS criteria: The ratio performs as well as the complex 5-criterion metabolic syndrome definition
- •Particle quality: Elevated ratio indicates not just metabolic dysfunction but also atherogenic LDL particle pattern
The findings emphasize that a single calculated ratio from routine blood work can identify high-risk patients who might otherwise be missed.
Paradigm Relevance
How this study applies to different clinical perspectives:
Standard Medical
RelevantConventional clinical guidelines used by most doctors
Why it matters:
Not incorporated into standard screening guidelines
Research Consensus
RelevantCurrent scientific understanding, often ahead of guidelines
Why it matters:
Supports use of TG/HDL ratio as universal metabolic marker regardless of BMI
Metabolic Optimization
RelevantProactive targets for optimal health, not just disease absence
Why it matters:
Important for identifying metabolically unhealthy normal-weight individuals (MUNW phenotype)
Study Details
- Type
- Cohort Study
- Methodology
- N = 449 for insulin resistance testing; N = 1,135 for LDL particle analysis. Evaluated routine lipoprotein measurements as predictors of insulin resistance and small dense LDL.
Evidence Quality
Grade A - Well-designed study from Stanford. Builds on 2003 McLaughlin work. Note: Full text paywalled (American Journal of Cardiology). Content derived from PubMed abstract only.
Related Biomarkers
Calculate & Evaluate on Metabolicum
Original Source
DOI (Digital Object Identifier) is a permanent link to this publication. Unlike website URLs that can change, a DOI always resolves to the correct source.
Related Studies
Freeman 2023: Insulin Resistance - Clinical Overview
Freeman et al. • StatPearls Publishing • 2023
HOMA-IR is the most practical clinical tool for assessing insulin resistance
Insights from a general practice service evaluation supporting a lower carbohydrate diet in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and prediabetes: a secondary analysis of routine clinic data including HbA1c, weight and prescribing over 6 years
Unwin et al. • BMJ Nutrition, Prevention & Health • 2020
T2D drug-free remission: 46% (59/128); HbA1c 65.5→48 mmol/mol (P<0.001); weight 99.7→91.4 kg; prediabetes: 93% normalized HbA1c; £50,885/year prescription savings
Sutton 2018: Time-Restricted Eating Improves Insulin Sensitivity
Sutton et al. • Cell Metabolism • 2018
Early 6-hour eating window improved insulin sensitivity by 36% without weight loss