ACC/AHA 2019: Cholesterol Management Guidelines
Grundy SM, et al. • Journal of the American College of Cardiology
Key Finding
Non-HDL-C is recommended as a secondary treatment target after LDL-C goals are achieved. For very high-risk patients, consider non-HDL-C <100 mg/dL.
Key Findings
- 1LDL-C treatment targets restored: <70 mg/dL for very high risk, <100 mg/dL for high risk
- 2Non-HDL-C is secondary target when triglycerides ≥200 mg/dL, set 30 mg/dL above LDL-C target
- 3Very high-risk patients may benefit from non-HDL-C <100 mg/dL
- 4Risk-enhancing factors and CAC scoring enable personalized treatment decisions
- 5PCSK9 inhibitors recommended for very high-risk patients not at goal on maximally tolerated statin
Original title: “2018 ACC/AHA Guideline on the Management of Blood Cholesterol”
Plain English Summary
Comprehensive clinical practice guideline from 12 professional organizations led by Grundy, Stone, and Bailey. Emphasizes shared decision-making and risk-based statin therapy. Recommends measuring both LDL-C and non-HDL-C, with non-HDL-C particularly important for patients with elevated triglycerides (≥200 mg/dL).
In-Depth Analysis
Background
The 2018 ACC/AHA Guideline on the Management of Blood Cholesterol (published November 2018, referenced as 2019 in clinical practice) represents the most current comprehensive cholesterol management guideline in the United States. This document firmly establishes non-HDL cholesterol as a key secondary target alongside LDL-C.
Guideline Development
Process:
- •Systematic evidence review through July 2017
- •GRADE methodology for evidence quality assessment
- •Expert writing committee with multidisciplinary representation
- •External peer review and public comment period
- •Formal endorsement by ACC, AHA, and multiple specialty societies
Evidence Base:
- •134 randomized controlled trials reviewed
- •Prospective cohort studies for risk prediction
- •Meta-analyses of statin and non-statin therapies
- •Cost-effectiveness analyses
Key Recommendations for Non-HDL-C
Position Statement: "Non-HDL-C may be used as a secondary target for treatment intensification after maximally tolerated statin therapy."
Specific Guidance:
- •
Threshold for Consideration:
- •Non-HDL-C ≥130 mg/dL in high-risk patients on statin therapy
- •Corresponds to approximately LDL-C 100 + 30 mg/dL offset
- •
Risk Enhancement:
- •Persistently elevated TG (≥175 mg/dL) listed as risk-enhancing factor
- •Non-HDL-C helps identify residual atherogenic burden
- •
Treatment Intensification:
- •After LDL-C goals achieved, consider non-HDL-C
- •Addition of ezetimibe or PCSK9 inhibitor based on non-HDL-C
- •Lifestyle intensification for TG-mediated non-HDL-C elevation
Risk Assessment Framework
The guideline introduced the Pooled Cohort Equations (PCE) for 10-year ASCVD risk estimation but also emphasized:
Risk-Enhancing Factors:
- •Persistently elevated TG ≥175 mg/dL
- •Metabolic syndrome
- •hsCRP ≥2.0 mg/L
- •apoB ≥130 mg/dL (correlates with non-HDL-C)
- •Lipoprotein(a) elevation
- •Ankle-brachial index <0.9
Role of Non-HDL-C: When any risk-enhancing factor present, non-HDL-C helps guide treatment intensity and assess residual risk.
Comparison with Prior Guidelines
| Feature | ATP III (2001) | ACC/AHA 2013 | ACC/AHA 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Non-HDL-C | Secondary target | De-emphasized | Restored as secondary target |
| When to use | TG ≥200 | Not specified | TG ≥175 or as risk enhancer |
| Treatment | Add fibrate/niacin | Statin intensity | Intensify + add ezetimibe/PCSK9i |
Practical Implementation
Step 1: Assess baseline lipids and calculate non-HDL-C Step 2: Initiate appropriate statin intensity based on ASCVD risk Step 3: Repeat lipids 4-12 weeks after starting statin Step 4: If LDL-C at goal but non-HDL-C elevated:
- •Reinforce lifestyle (especially TG reduction)
- •Consider adding ezetimibe
- •For very high-risk patients, consider PCSK9 inhibitor
Metabolic Health Perspective
The ACC/AHA 2018 guideline acknowledges the metabolic drivers of cardiovascular risk:
- •Metabolic syndrome recognition: Listed as risk-enhancing factor
- •TG threshold lowered: From 200 to 175 mg/dL, reflecting understanding that even moderate TG elevation matters
- •Lifestyle emphasis: Diet, exercise, weight loss for TG reduction
- •Comprehensive approach: Beyond LDL-C to full atherogenic burden
For individuals pursuing metabolic optimization, this guideline validates:
- •Using non-HDL-C to track progress
- •Addressing insulin resistance to lower TG and non-HDL-C
- •Looking beyond statins to lifestyle intervention
- •Understanding that "normal" LDL-C may hide atherogenic dyslipidemia
The guideline represents a synthesis of decades of research supporting non-HDL-C as a clinically valuable, easily calculated, and comprehensive marker of atherogenic lipoprotein burden.
Paradigm Relevance
How this study applies to different clinical perspectives:
Standard Medical
RelevantConventional clinical guidelines used by most doctors
Why it matters:
Defines current standard of care for cholesterol management in the US. LDL-C primary target; non-HDL-C secondary target for patients with TG ≥200 mg/dL.
Research Consensus
RelevantCurrent scientific understanding, often ahead of guidelines
Why it matters:
Incorporates risk-enhancing factors and coronary artery calcium scoring for personalized treatment decisions.
Metabolic Optimization
RelevantProactive targets for optimal health, not just disease absence
Why it matters:
Supports aggressive lipid lowering in very high-risk patients. Non-HDL-C <100 mg/dL target aligns with metabolic optimization goals.
Study Details
- Type
- Clinical Guideline
- Methodology
- Comprehensive clinical practice guideline developed by 12 professional organizations. Systematic review of evidence with graded recommendations. Focus on atherosclerotic CVD risk reduction.
Evidence Quality
Grade A - Major clinical guideline from ACC/AHA with multi-society endorsement. Represents current standard of care. Full text freely available.
Related Biomarkers
Calculate & Evaluate on Metabolicum
Original Source
DOI (Digital Object Identifier) is a permanent link to this publication. Unlike website URLs that can change, a DOI always resolves to the correct source.
Related Studies
ATP III 2002: Non-HDL-C as Secondary Treatment Target
NCEP ATP III • Circulation • 2002
Non-HDL-C target is set 30 mg/dL higher than LDL-C target. For high-risk patients: LDL-C <100 mg/dL corresponds to non-HDL-C <130 mg/dL.
ATP III 2001: Original Metabolic Syndrome Criteria
NCEP ATP III • JAMA • 2001
ATP III criteria: presence of ≥3 of abdominal obesity (waist >102/88 cm), elevated TG (≥150), low HDL (<40/50), elevated BP (≥130/85), elevated fasting glucose (≥110, later revised to ≥100).