ATP III 2002: Non-HDL-C as Secondary Treatment Target
NCEP ATP III • Circulation
Key Finding
Non-HDL-C target is set 30 mg/dL higher than LDL-C target. For high-risk patients: LDL-C <100 mg/dL corresponds to non-HDL-C <130 mg/dL.
Key Findings
- 1First guideline to establish non-HDL-C as formal treatment target
- 2Non-HDL-C target = LDL-C target + 30 mg/dL
- 3Secondary target for patients with triglycerides ≥200 mg/dL
- 4Also formalized metabolic syndrome diagnostic criteria
Original title: “Third Report of the NCEP Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (ATP III)”
Plain English Summary
The landmark NCEP Adult Treatment Panel III guidelines established non-HDL cholesterol as a secondary target of therapy for patients with elevated triglycerides (≥200 mg/dL). This report introduced the concept of using non-HDL-C to capture the atherogenic potential of all apoB-containing lipoproteins.
In-Depth Analysis
Background
The Third Report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults, known as ATP III, represents the most influential lipid management guideline of the early 2000s. This comprehensive report officially introduced non-HDL cholesterol as a secondary treatment target.
Development and Methodology
ATP III was developed by an expert panel convened by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI). The guideline synthesis process included:
- •Systematic evidence review of clinical trials and epidemiological studies
- •Meta-analyses of statin trials and lipid interventions
- •Expert consensus on treatment thresholds and targets
- •Risk stratification framework based on Framingham risk scores
Key Innovations
Non-HDL-C as Secondary Target: ATP III was the first major guideline to formally recommend non-HDL-C as a treatment target for patients with elevated triglycerides (≥200 mg/dL). The recommended target: non-HDL-C = LDL-C target + 30 mg/dL.
Risk Categories Established:
- •High risk: CHD or CHD risk equivalents (LDL goal <100 mg/dL)
- •Moderately high risk: 2+ risk factors, 10-year risk 10-20%
- •Moderate risk: 2+ risk factors, 10-year risk <10%
- •Lower risk: 0-1 risk factors
Metabolic Syndrome Recognition: ATP III introduced metabolic syndrome as a clinical entity requiring specific attention, defined by any 3 of 5 criteria:
- •Waist circumference >102 cm (men) or >88 cm (women)
- •Triglycerides ≥150 mg/dL
- •HDL-C <40 mg/dL (men) or <50 mg/dL (women)
- •Blood pressure ≥130/85 mmHg
- •Fasting glucose ≥110 mg/dL
Rationale for Non-HDL-C
The guideline provided detailed scientific rationale:
- •Captures atherogenic particles: Non-HDL-C reflects all apoB-containing lipoproteins
- •Better with high TG: When TG >200, Friedewald LDL-C becomes unreliable
- •No additional testing: Calculated from standard lipid panel
- •Clinical trials support: Statin benefit correlates with non-HDL-C reduction
Treatment Algorithm
For patients with TG ≥200 mg/dL:
- •First achieve LDL-C goal with statin therapy
- •Then target non-HDL-C as secondary goal
- •Consider adding niacin or fibrate if non-HDL-C remains elevated
- •Intensify lifestyle intervention (weight loss, exercise, reduce refined carbs)
Impact on Clinical Practice
ATP III transformed lipid management by:
- •Making non-HDL-C a routine clinical consideration
- •Highlighting the TG-rich lipoprotein contribution to CVD risk
- •Establishing treatment targets beyond LDL-C
- •Recognizing metabolic syndrome as requiring comprehensive intervention
Metabolic Health Perspective
From a metabolic optimization standpoint, ATP III acknowledged that patients with metabolic syndrome require attention to the full atherogenic dyslipidemia pattern: elevated TG, low HDL-C, and small dense LDL. Non-HDL-C elegantly captures this atherogenic burden in a single measurement.
Paradigm Relevance
How this study applies to different clinical perspectives:
Standard Medical
RelevantConventional clinical guidelines used by most doctors
Why it matters:
Established LDL-C as primary target with non-HDL-C as secondary target when TG ≥200 mg/dL.
Research Consensus
RelevantCurrent scientific understanding, often ahead of guidelines
Why it matters:
First guideline to formally recognize non-HDL-C clinical utility.
Metabolic Optimization
Proactive targets for optimal health, not just disease absence
Not directly relevant to this paradigm
Study Details
- Type
- Clinical Guideline
- Methodology
- Clinical guideline based on systematic evidence review. Expert panel consensus. Replaced ATP II (1993).
Evidence Quality
Grade A - Major clinical guideline that shaped lipid management for over a decade. Foundation for non-HDL-C as treatment target.
Related Biomarkers
Calculate & Evaluate on Metabolicum
Original Source
DOI (Digital Object Identifier) is a permanent link to this publication. Unlike website URLs that can change, a DOI always resolves to the correct source.
Related Studies
ACC/AHA 2019: Cholesterol Management Guidelines
Grundy SM, et al. • Journal of the American College of Cardiology • 2019
Non-HDL-C is recommended as a secondary treatment target after LDL-C goals are achieved. For very high-risk patients, consider non-HDL-C <100 mg/dL.
ATP III 2001: Original Metabolic Syndrome Criteria
NCEP ATP III • JAMA • 2001
ATP III criteria: presence of ≥3 of abdominal obesity (waist >102/88 cm), elevated TG (≥150), low HDL (<40/50), elevated BP (≥130/85), elevated fasting glucose (≥110, later revised to ≥100).