Sandesara 2019: Atherogenic Lipoprotein Subfractions
Sandesara et al. • Journal of the American Heart Association
Key Finding
Remnant-like particles are independently associated with cardiovascular disease
Original title: “Association of Atherogenic Lipoprotein Subfractions With Cardiovascular Disease”
Plain English Summary
Review of atherogenic lipoprotein subfractions including remnant particles and their association with cardiovascular disease.
In-Depth Analysis
Background
Dr. Pratik B. Sandesara and colleagues published this review in the Journal of the American Heart Association (PMID: 30312399), examining atherogenic lipoprotein subfractions including remnant cholesterol.
Study Design
Review synthesizing evidence on lipoprotein subfractions beyond standard LDL-C, with focus on remnant cholesterol and its cardiovascular implications.
Key Findings
Remnant cholesterol definition:
- •Calculated: Total-C − LDL-C − HDL-C
- •Represents cholesterol in VLDL, IDL, and chylomicron remnants
Evidence for remnant cholesterol:
| Evidence Type | Key Finding |
|---|---|
| Observational | Independent CVD predictor |
| Mendelian randomization | Causal relationship established |
| Mechanistic | Direct arterial wall penetration |
Comparison with LDL-C:
- •Remnants don't require oxidation for macrophage uptake
- •More pro-inflammatory than native LDL
- •Often elevated when triglycerides high
- •Not captured by LDL-C measurement
Mechanistic Insights
Remnant particles are atherogenic because:
- •Small enough to enter arterial intima
- •Directly taken up by macrophages (no oxidation needed)
- •Cholesterol-rich (higher cholesterol per particle than LDL)
- •Pro-inflammatory (activate endothelium)
Clinical Implications
Elevated remnant cholesterol (>30 mg/dL) indicates:
- •Triglyceride-rich lipoprotein excess
- •Potential underestimation of CVD risk by LDL alone
- •Need for triglyceride-lowering strategies
Metabolic Health Perspective
Remnant cholesterol responds dramatically to carbohydrate restriction (as triglycerides fall). It provides additional insight beyond LDL-C and represents an emerging target for metabolic cardiovascular risk assessment.
Paradigm Relevance
How this study applies to different clinical perspectives:
Standard Medical
Conventional clinical guidelines used by most doctors
Not directly relevant to this paradigm
Research Consensus
RelevantCurrent scientific understanding, often ahead of guidelines
Metabolic Optimization
RelevantProactive targets for optimal health, not just disease absence
Study Details
- Type
- Review Article
Related Biomarkers
Calculate & Evaluate on Metabolicum
Original Source
DOI (Digital Object Identifier) is a permanent link to this publication. Unlike website URLs that can change, a DOI always resolves to the correct source.
Related Studies
Budoff 2024: The KETO Trial Shows No Excess Plaque in High-LDL Dieters
Budoff et al. • JACC: Advances • 2024
KETO vs control: CAC median 0 vs 1 (P=0.520); total plaque score 0 vs 1 (P=0.357); 55% vs 48% zero CAC; no correlation between LDL and plaque (r=0.12, P=0.29)
Norwitz 2021: Evidence for the Lean Mass Hyper-Responder Phenotype
Norwitz et al. • Current Developments in Nutrition • 2022
LMHR criteria (18% of sample): LDL ≥200, HDL ≥80, TG ≤70 mg/dL; LMHR BMI 22.0 vs 24.6 non-LMHR (P=1.2×10⁻¹⁰); median LDL increase 146 vs 61 mg/dL
The Lipid Energy Model: Reimagining Lipoprotein Function in the Context of Carbohydrate-Restricted Diets
Norwitz et al. • Metabolites • 2022
LEM proposes carbohydrate restriction in lean individuals increases hepatic VLDL secretion with enhanced lipoprotein lipase turnover, generating elevated LDL without FH genetic markers