Skip to main content
Back to Research Library
B
Good Confidence
Review ArticleSource2008

The Omega-3 Index as a Risk Factor for Coronary Heart Disease

Harris WSAm J Clin Nutr

Key Finding

The Omega-3 Index is a novel, modifiable risk factor for CHD with clinical utility.

Original title: The omega-3 index as a risk factor for coronary heart disease

Plain English Summary

Review of evidence supporting the Omega-3 Index as a modifiable risk factor. Proposes target of ≥8% for cardiovascular protection based on epidemiological data.

In-Depth Analysis

Background

Dr. William S. Harris published this follow-up review in the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition (PMID: 18541601), further establishing the Omega-3 Index as a clinically useful risk factor for coronary heart disease.

Study Design

Review of evidence supporting the Omega-3 Index as a modifiable risk factor, including analytical standardization, population data, and clinical utility assessment.

Key Findings

Analytical validation:

  • Coefficient of variation: <5% (excellent reproducibility)
  • Stability: RBCs reflect ~120-day intake
  • Reference range: Established across populations

Population distribution:

RegionMean Omega-3 Index
USA4-5%
UK4-5%
Germany5-6%
Korea8-9%
Japan9-11%

Regions with higher indices have lower cardiovascular mortality.

Modifiability:

  • Fish intake: +0.5% per serving/week
  • Fish oil supplements: +1-2% with 1 g EPA+DHA/day
  • Response time: 4-6 months to plateau

Mechanistic Insights

The Omega-3 Index reflects cardiac membrane composition:

  • RBC and cardiac tissue levels correlate strongly
  • Membrane omega-3 affects ion channel function
  • Determines arrhythmia susceptibility

Clinical Implications

The Omega-3 Index meets criteria for a useful risk factor:

  1. Biologically plausible mechanism
  2. Graded relationship with outcomes
  3. Modifiable with predictable response
  4. Measurable with standardized assay

Metabolic Health Perspective

Testing the Omega-3 Index removes guesswork from omega-3 status assessment. Unlike dietary recall, it objectively measures tissue levels. Target of ≥8% is achievable and associated with meaningful cardiovascular protection.

Paradigm Relevance

How this study applies to different clinical perspectives:

Standard Medical

Conventional clinical guidelines used by most doctors

Not directly relevant to this paradigm

Research Consensus

Relevant

Current scientific understanding, often ahead of guidelines

Metabolic Optimization

Relevant

Proactive targets for optimal health, not just disease absence

Study Details

Type
Review Article

Calculate & Evaluate on Metabolicum

Original Source

Related Studies